Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | slaxx | 5-0 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | don_goto1990 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Rakdos Reanimator | ermagoframiro | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Mono Black Demons | brunoprince | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Golgari Midrange | harodt | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Reanimator , Abzan Roots , Abzan Superfriends , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Descend , Dimir Faeries
Meta Performance Analysis
Liliana of the Veil ranks #206 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 61%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 60.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Liliana of the Veil is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 15.96 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Liliana of the Veil has a win rate of 74.5%, making it 7.7% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 6 | 80.0% | 2 |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 8 | 77.6% | 2 |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 6 | 70.0% | 1 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 8 | 67.6% | 4 |
| Breach the Multiverse | Sorcery | 11 | 67.0% | 6 |
| Vivien Reid | Legendary Planeswalker — Vivien | 42 | 58.8% | 9 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 22 | 53.5% | 6 |
| Grim Bauble | Artifact | 42 | 53.4% | 8 |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 13 | 53.0% | 3 |
| The Eternal Wanderer | Legendary Planeswalker | 5 | 51.7% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Liliana of the Veil than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 6 | 86.8% | 72.3% | +14.6% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 7 | 83.1% | 71.4% | +11.6% |
| Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 3 | 5 | 88.0% | 76.6% | +11.4% |
| Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 10 | 81.5% | 70.3% | +11.2% |
| Tinybones Joins Up | Legendary Enchantment | 1 | 6 | 86.0% | 75.0% | +11.1% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 9 | 78.2% | 70.3% | +7.9% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 8 | 79.6% | 71.8% | +7.8% |
| Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 10 | 78.3% | 71.1% | +7.3% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 9 | 78.2% | 71.0% | +7.1% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 9 | 78.2% | 71.3% | +6.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Demons | 265 | 48.6% | 45.5% |
| Golgari Midrange | 162 | 20.9% | 39.7% |
| Mono Black Demons | 70 | 72.2% | 35.4% |
| Dimir Midrange | 45 | 2.2% | 36.9% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 44 | 68.8% | 48.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.